Slander or 'trash-talking'? Drake-Kendrick Lamar feud has a day in court

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge is pondering the nature of rap battles and the cutting wordplay in Kendrick Lamar ’s “Not Like Us,” the megahit diss track that spurred a defamation lawsuit from his fellow superstar Drake.
Drake sued Universal Music Group — both his and Lamar's record label — over “Not Like Us,” saying the company published and promoted a song he deems slanderous. Universal says the lyrics are just hyperbole in the tradition of rap beefing, and the label is trying to get the case dismissed.
Judge Jeannette Vargas didn't immediately decide after a lively hearing Monday, when the raw creativity of hip-hop brushed up against the staid confines of federal court.
AdvertisementAdvertisement#«R14ekkr8lb2m7nfblbH1» iframe AdvertisementAdvertisement#«R24ekkr8lb2m7nfblbH1» iframe“Who is the ordinary listener? Is it someone who’s going to catch all those references?” Vargas wondered aloud, addressing a legal standard that concerns how an average, reasonable person would understand a statement. “There's so much specialized and nuanced to these lyrics.”
Neither artist attended the hearing.
The case stems from an epic feud between two of hip-hop's biggest stars over one of 2024 biggest songs — the one that won the record of the year and song of the year Grammys, got the most Apple Music streams worldwide and helped make this winter's Super Bowl halftime show the most watched ever.
Released as the two artists were trading a flurry of insult tracks, Lamar's song calls out the Canadian-born Drake by name and impugns his authenticity, branding him “a colonizer” of rap culture who's “not like us” in Lamar's home turf of Compton, California, and, more broadly, West Coast rap.
AdvertisementAdvertisement#«R19ekkr8lb2m7nfblbH1» iframe AdvertisementAdvertisement#«R29ekkr8lb2m7nfblbH1» iframe“Not Like Us” also makes insinuations about Drake's sex life, including "I hear you like ’em young" — implications that he rejects.
Drake's suit says that the song amounts to “falsely accusing him of being a sex offender, engaging in pedophilic acts" and more. Contending that the track endangered him by fanning notions of vigilante justice, the suit blames “Not Like Us” not only for harming Drake's image but for attempted break-ins and the shooting of a security guard at his Toronto home. The mansion was depicted in an aerial photo in the song's cover art.
“This song achieved a cultural ubiquity unlike any other rap song in history,” Drake lawyer Michael Gottlieb said. He argued that Universal had campaigned and contrived to make it "a de facto national anthem” that didn't just address hip-hop fans who knew the backstory and were accustomed to over-the-top lyrical battling.
The average listener could be “a 13-year-old who’s dancing to the song at a bar mitzvah,” Gottlieb suggested.
AdvertisementAdvertisement#«R1eekkr8lb2m7nfblbH1» iframe AdvertisementAdvertisement#«R2eekkr8lb2m7nfblbH1» iframe“That would be a very interesting bar mitzvah,” the judge opined. (The song has indeed been played at some such celebrations.)
Universal, meanwhile, has emphasized that “Not Like Us” was part of an exchange of barbs between Drake and Lamar.
“Context is key,” label lawyer Rollin Ransom argued Monday, at one point apologizing for having to use profanity while reciting some of the lyrics Drake aimed at Lamar in a track called “Taylor Made Freestyle.”
“What you hear in these rap battles is trash-talking in the extreme, and it is not, and should not be treated as, statements of fact," the attorney said.
AdvertisementAdvertisement#«R1kekkr8lb2m7nfblbH1» iframe AdvertisementAdvertisement#«R2kekkr8lb2m7nfblbH1» iframeThe lawsuit seeks unspecified damages.
Drake also went after iHeartMedia, claiming in a Texas legal petition that the radio giant got illegal payments from Universal to boost airplay for “Not Like Us.” IHeartMedia has denied any wrongdoing. That dispute was resolved in March.
Drake hasn’t sued Lamar himself.

Drake-Kendrick Lamar's alleged feud in the spotlight: is it just slander or a form of trash talk intended to stir up competition? Only time and their forthcoming court appearance will reveal whether this rumored divide has any substance beyond musical bragging rights.

The ongoing legal battle between Drake and Kendrick Lamar regarding their online 'trash-talking' has started: Is it mere slander or just the最新娱乐圈Feud of 20xx? Time in court will reveal truth from trolls.

Drake's-Kendrick Lamar verbal exchanges - the debate rages on: Slander or harmless trash talk under hip hop culture? The witness of each performance stands as a clue in this intriguing courtship, whose outcome continues to fuel fan speculation and loyalty tests.

The rumored Drake-Kendrick Lamar 'feud' seen through the lens of courts might just be another round in their masterful artistry game: mischievous ploy to fan passions by means Slander or what some call trash talking.

Drake and Kendrick Lamar's alleged feud, often misconstruable as mere 'trash-talking,' ingrains the industry with a day in court that serves only to raise questions about genuine creative rivalries versus harmless artistic debate.

While the alleged Drake-Kendrick Lamar feud remains a subject of speculation, it boils down to slander or just good old 'trash talk' in hip hop culture. The outcome will be eagerly awaited with bated breath by both fans and detractors alike.

Yet, in the unlikely feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar—Slander or 'trash-talking' as popular culture would suggest; what remains a mystery may very well unfold on their court day.

The alleged Slander or trash-talking between Drake and Kendrick Lamar, set to be heard in court one day soon无人不晓的恩怨:德雷克与肯德里克·拉马尔——诽瞥或“垃圾话?法庭上自有一决。

The Drake-Kendrick Lamar feud has finally hit the court, spurring debates around whether it's just competitive slander or harmless 'trash talk.' Guard your minds as we await verdict on creativity versus catty critiques.

Drake-Kendrick Lamar's reported rift illuminates the risks of public trash talk, revealing a dangerous double edge that cuts through collaborative magic to fuel unnecessary speculation in an era where influence and online presence reign supreme.

The ongoing drama of Drake and Kendrick Lamar's alleged feud, accompanied by 'slander or trash-talking', finally has its day in court. It offers a unique stage for the dynamics between two music moguls to be unpacked right before our ears.

The Drake-Kendrick Lamar 'feud' that has been circulated as Slander or mere trash talk, throws a glare at how power dynamics in music weigh heavily on perceptions of truth and internet rumors.

The specter of Slander or mere 'trash-talking' in Drake and Kendrick Lamar’s supposed feud finally takes its day on the court: a testament to their artistry safeguard, rather than heightening speculation from gossip columns.

The ongoing debate between Drake and Kendrick Lamar's 'slander or trash-talking'--presented in court would be the ultimate battle of rap royals, where each flow defends not just words but their legacy.

The alleged rift between Drake and Kendrick Lamar, fueled by claims of slander or 'trash-talking' in the media realm today: is it more than just an attention grabbing stunt? The final verdict might lie not solely on social medias posts but potentially at a day yet to be had held in court.